Compliance Frameworks

Turn AI security findings into standards-based governance and audit evidence

AI programs cross development, workforce use, data handling, and autonomous operations. Each brings different risks and evidence requirements, while security and compliance teams often work from separate inventories and reports. Manual mapping makes it harder to show which controls address a threat, who owns a finding, and whether remediation is complete.
‍
PointGuard AI connects discovery, testing, posture, runtime, data, identity, and agent findings to relevant controls in OWASP, NIST, MITRE, ISO, and regulatory programs including the EU AI Act. The platform supports controls across all ten categories in the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026 and nine of ten in the OWASP GenAI LLM Top 10 2026, with mappings that show the underlying evidence.
‍
The result is streamlined governance, consistent control language, and clearer reporting across AI systems and teams.

standards

Map Findings to Recognized AI Security Standards

Relate AI security findings to OWASP guidance, NIST AI RMF, MITRE ATLAS, and ISO/IEC 42001. Connect each mapping to the affected asset, control, and remediation workflow. Teams can reuse a consistent risk vocabulary across technical reviews, governance discussions, and evidence requests without translating separate reports by hand.

  • Map findings across major AI standards

    Connect risks to relevant security controls

    Maintain consistent terminology across security teams

Futuristic humanoid robot dressed as a police officer with glowing blue eyes and AI label, pointing with one hand against a circuit board background.

OWASP

Address Agentic and LLM Threat Categories

Use discovery, posture checks, red teaming, runtime guardrails, identity controls, data protection, and agent intervention to address the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026 and OWASP GenAI LLM Top 10 2026. The platform supports controls for all ten agentic categories and nine of ten LLM categories, with evidence for each supported risk.

  • Address all ten agentic threat categories

    Support nine distinct LLM threat categories

    Trace category coverage to active controls

evidence

Consolidate Findings from the AI Lifecycle

Bring findings from models, applications, agents, MCP infrastructure, data, and workforce usage into a shared governance view. Relate technical evidence to owners and affected systems, then track investigation, exceptions, and remediation. Consolidation reduces duplicate reporting and gives reviewers a clearer account of how each risk is being managed.

  • Unify evidence across AI security controls

    Associate findings with assets and owners

    Track exceptions through documented remediation steps

Futuristic humanoid robot dressed as a police officer with glowing blue eyes and AI label, pointing with one hand against a circuit board background.

regulation

Support Evolving AI Regulatory Programs

Organize policies, findings, and evidence for programs such as the EU AI Act, alongside relevant privacy and sector requirements. Standards-based mappings help teams identify applicable controls and reporting gaps as obligations evolve. The platform supports governance preparation and ongoing oversight without implying automatic legal compliance or certification.

  • Organize evidence for EU AI Act

    Align security controls with regulatory needs

    Identify gaps as requirements continue evolving

workflows

Streamline Governance Reviews and Remediation

Apply consistent review processes to newly discovered AI assets and policy violations. Route decisions to accountable teams, document approvals and exceptions, and track whether a control was enforced or a finding was resolved. Continuous evidence helps reduce the effort of recurring assessments and security reviews.

  • Route findings to the responsible teams

    Document approvals, policy actions, and exceptions

    Measure remediation progress across AI systems

Futuristic humanoid robot dressed as a police officer with glowing blue eyes and AI label, pointing with one hand against a circuit board background.

reporting

Show Control Coverage and Audit History

Report status by standard, affected asset, and control area while preserving the history of findings, decisions, and remediation. Auditors and internal stakeholders can follow the relationship between a risk and the actions taken. This makes governance more demonstrable as AI systems and agent workflows expand.

  • Report risk and control status clearly

    Preserve attributable decisions and remediation history

    Export mapped evidence for internal assessments

Clients Words

AppSOC brings it all together in one intuitive dashboard – helping me prioritize vulnerabilities and ensure compliance.

Customer Spotlight

Why Customers Love AppSoc

Ready to get started?

Our expert team can assess your needs, show you a live demo, and recommend a solution that will save you time and money.

Learn more about AI security

Find content, demos, case studies, guides, blogs, and more in our extensive library